News & Advocacy
John Grady Presents at New Jersey's Fiduciary Duty Information Conference
ADISA’s Immediate-Past President, John Grady of DLA Piper LLP, provided comments on New Jersey’s Pre-proposed Amendment 2018-004, known as the Fiduciary Rule, at a hearing conducted by the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs and its Bureau of Securities on November 19, 2018, in Newark, New Jersey.
SPECIAL ALERT
GET INVOLVED!
Interested in learning more about how you can influence public policy?
ADISA encourages members and other industry professionals to participate in advocacy.
To learn more, contact us at adisa@adisa.org or (317) 663-4180.
ADISA’s Immediate-Past President, John Grady of DLA Piper LLP, provided comments on New Jersey’s Pre-proposed Amendment 2018-004, known as the Fiduciary Rule, at a hearing conducted by the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs and its Bureau of Securities on November 19, 2018, in Newark, New Jersey.
Speaking on behalf of ADISA, Mr. Grady elaborated on the following points:
- The imposition of a fiduciary standard on financial advisory firms operating in New Jersey will create significant burdens on those firms that employ a transaction-based or “commission” approach. Such a standard will limit New Jersey residents’ access to quality advice, especially among small balance savers.
- Having access to investment advice is tied to higher rates of saving and more diversified investment strategies and client portfolios. Imposing a fiduciary standard on financial advisers will cause investors, especially low or smaller balance savers, to have fewer options for accessing access high quality investment advice. Many such savers need access to “alternative” (non-correlating), investments to adequately diversify their portfolios against volatility; such products are difficult to access without a financial adviser.
- The SEC is working on a single standard for broker-dealers that, if adopted, will provide consistent standards and nationwide investor protections, as opposed to a state-by-state approach.
ADISA submitted a letter (drafted by John Grady and ADISA Executive Director John Harrison), to New Jersey’s Division of Consumer Affairs regarding this issue. ADISA believes in appropriate regulation for all of its members and their various activities, including its members in New Jersey. The overriding goal is to ensure that the cost imposed by a regulation is matched or exceeded by the benefit produced thereby. ADISA believes that New Jersey and other states would be wise to see the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest (RBI) in action before placing additional regulatory burdens which seek to serve roughly the same purpose.
You can read the letter in its entirety here.
Next up...
-
7/24/2025
Event Recap: New Leadership & In-Depth Research & Due Diligence
Thank you to everyone who joined us for a powerful week of connection, education, and collaboration at TNDDA by ADISA and the ADISA Alts Research & Due Diligence Forum.
READ MORE -
7/22/2025
ADISA Member Alert: FinCEN Delays Investment Adviser AML Rule
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced today that it will postpone implementation of the Investment Adviser Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Rule, originally set to take effect on January 1, 2026. The new effective date will be January 1, 2028.
READ MORE -
7/8/2025
ADISA Appoints Jade Miller as First CEO
In the newly created role, Miller will work alongside Executive Director John Grady to lead the organization’s next chapter.
READ MORE